Mint 400: May 29, 2008

12 above .500

Posted by seed @ 10:28 PM


Vote early, vote often. Might as well get the entire team in the All-Star game. Righteous.
Mint 400: May 27, 2008

Vintage Mint

Posted by seed @ 4:49 PM

As an addendum to the previous post, that I erased, regarding the upgrade to MT 4.1, the blog spanned six years and had a DB text file that was nearly 5Mbs. That caused the latest crash of our dated installation of Berkley DB. Which leads us to MT 4.1. One of the new features is the ability to MultiBlog, or cross-reference content across multiple blogs, within the same installation of MT. I took that as an opportunity to divide the Mint into more manageable pieces. With that I brought back the old templates that have been used here over the years. Remember what we used to look like in 2006? How about 2004-2005? And then there is still my favorite, 2002-2003. For better or worse, I've kept them in their original format, only modifying a few things to make them sync with the more recent content. Things will continue to be posted here as it was. The old content will reside in its original format, as it was originally created. Looking back at it, I enjoy seeing where we've been and how much time we've wasted here. A few Tech Notes:
  1. The search function accesses all the mint's content: Mint Search for "clinton"
  2. The home page will still access all the content through the archives pulldown. Though, you will notice that the order of the archives is off. That's a product of the MT software. Long story short, each blog gets an ID# that seems to be only determined by the order in which the blogs were created. I created 2002-2003 after the current content. So, it comes in the order. I don't think I can fix that, as I cannot locate where the blog IDs are determined.
  3. I'm not sure we used the categories much prior to 2007, so that pulldown will just result in the recent content.
  4. Commenting is still open on old posts.

Mint 400: May 26, 2008

This weekend's work

Posted by seed @ 9:59 PM

BTW: who ever on the MovableType development team that though it was a great idea to put all that extra code into, say an image upload, should go fuck themselves four times. Your extra inline styles are stooopid.


Mint 400: May 23, 2008

Two New Things to Love about PGH

Posted by Savage Henry @ 11:35 AM

So, in case you're not keeping tabs, I no longer live in the US Capital. I've moved north to Steel City Robot City USA. It's a decent town, though like any other not without its faults. The Girlie and I have been settling in, buying property, the usual. Rains more than I'd like, the fact that power lines aren't buried makes it look like the whole town is rigged with bailing wire and duct tape, and the airport is too effing far away. But there are some great things. Two more of which I found just yesterday.
  1. My favorite pub is offering cask ales (I hate the word "firkin", but what are you gonna do...). Ate dinner there last night, and tried the Big Hop. It was served a bit warmer than the US usually likes beer, but it brings out a lot of of taste (cold things deaden your tastebuds; this is one reason people like custard and soft-serve ice cream -- it's kept at a warmer temp so you taste more when you eat it).
  2. There is a fantastic microbrewery --East End Brewing Company -- just stumbling distance from my new house. Literally walked there, bought two growlers (the Fat Gary and the Session Ale), and walked home in under 15 minutes last night. Yes, I anticipate there being problems. Sweet, oaty, barley-laden, hoppy problems. Turns out they sell kegs of the stuff. When we do our kitchen remodel, I've already gotten the a-OK to put in a tap to a keg in the basement. We'll rotate between this and Guinness (the missus' personal choice).

Mint 400: May 20, 2008

That says it all...

Posted by seed @ 3:20 PM

CNN: Doctors: Ted Kennedy has malignant brain tumor

New Jersey Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg said, “Ted Kennedy makes the Senate the place that it is, and has for so many years.”

You bet. I could not have said it better myself. While you are here, buy a shirt.


Mint 400:

Death of Journalism, Part 10,285

Posted by seed @ 11:51 AM

I'm positive that this little gem made Savage's skin crawl earlier this week:

"But when the world was on the brink of nuclear holocaust, Kennedy talked to Khrushchev and he got those missiles out of Cuba." (here)

Come again? Honestly, I'm not sure what is more disgusting about the Man from Fantasy Island: the malicously deceptive reinterpretation of history; or the manner in which the MSM, for the most part, oogles over it.

Try this: Obama needs a history lesson.

Maybe I am missing the nuance in Obama's rhetoric. For starters, when JFK and Khrushchev met it was a year prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis. We were not on the brink of nuclear war. But, in the spirit previously only attributed to a Clinton, maybe Obama didn't actually mean met.

Since we're all about facts here. That meeting, where you know Kennedy and Krushchev actually fucking met was after the Bay of Pigs. Which gets us to the cause of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Crisis was the result of Khrushchev's interpretation of Kennedy's weakness, through their meetings and, say it with me: the Bay of Pigs; where Kennedy pulled the plug on an attempted over throw of Castro by not authorizing the use of air support. As the Real Clear Politics article linked above states, it isn't that Kennedy wasn't willing to confront Castro, it's that Kennedy didn't have the stomach to commit and finish the job. That's the weakness that Khrushchev perceived and lead him to think that Kennedy might be able to be strong-armed into allowing the missile installations in Cuba, and if not, at least giving up something in return.

Kennedy's mishandling of the Bay of Pigs lead directly to the near disaster of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It was only through a naval blockade, a near nuclear stand-off and concessions by the US, eg: giving up missile installations in Turkey and agreeing to a non-invasion of Cuba that an understanding was reached. And, if you look at it from a Soviet perspective, that's not a bad deal.

I find it interesting that Barrack Obama failed to mention that in his statements. It's also worth pointing out that Kennedy's resume was considerably longer than Obama's at that point in his career, with military service and over a decade in Congress.

So there you go, now you can vote for hope. While you do, try not to be divided by, or label things with fact or understanding.


Mint 400: May 19, 2008

COD4 : variety pak sweetspots

Posted by seed @ 1:32 PM

If you are looking for me, I will be under the gazeebo-type thing on creek, with a twelve-pack, a stack of semi-used porno mags and my M60. Stop by when you get a minute.


Mint 400: May 16, 2008

Honorary Rider: George W Bush

Posted by seed @ 5:25 PM

In the spirit of LBJ's ...I don't care whether it's true. Just make the bastard deny it... This is the most cogent analysis I've read of the Bush-Appeasement speech this week in Israel.

No one in the US who runs for public office has suggested that the US break with Israel to appease terrorists. Obama certainly hasn't suggested that, and perhaps apart from the really lunatic fringes of both Left and Right, that notion doesn't get any oxygen at all here. Obviously, Bush wasn't referring to American politicians in this passage, but instead politicians in Europe and elsewhere who have either an animus towards Israel or appreciation for dhimmitude. Nothing -- and I mean nothing -- in this speech points to any candidate or the Democratic Party, unless they identify themselves as the reference.

Up until now, for the most part, W has kept himself out of the presidential race. With his low approval rating he has little to add to the race. There is no reason to think that this behavior would change any time soon. There is little incentive for him to take a swing at any of the candidates. Add that thinking to the text of the speech and you have a president defending his policies to an audience that is a direct beneficiary. It's nothing more until Obama, Biden and the rest draw attention to themselves by declaring their disbelief at the assumed accusation.

I'm not sure if this is brilliance on W's part, in that I mean his baiting of the parties to name themselves. Or, is it a gaffe by a junior campaigner and then a pile-on by the other hacks in the party. Even in combination, W is rider of the week.


Mint 400: May 15, 2008

Man-Cave: It's not a bar on the north side?

Posted by seed @ 2:27 PM

CNN: Beer, free stuff lead to 'man cave'

"The whole point of it, it's just guy time," he said. "There's no rules, there's no bathroom. It's just getting away. ... Most of it is just relaxation and having a good time. Nothing ever happens out there that can create any extra stress."

That's right. What's getting in the way of guy-time? Rules and bathrooms. Awesome. Next time I am having a great time with men, I will only think that it could be so much better without a bathroom or rules; rules like "when you have to take a crap, go into the tiny room with a porcelain fixture and make it go bye-bye."

That's not to say that a man cave wouldn't be a great thing to have access to, especially if you got to beat the living shit out of each other... for fun.


Mint 400:

Inkling Updates

Posted by seed @ 9:57 AM

After getting destroyed by Hillary's greater than 8% win in PA, and losing about $20k of fake cash, things are picking up. Here's an update in the markets I'm participating in: Mint Inklings


Mint 400:

We'll take him

Posted by seed @ 8:53 AM

Cubs make it official with Edmonds

I remember mentioning to Easy that I always thought highly of Edmonds. It's a shame that he's had some physical problems as of late. I always thought he was a total gamer. With San Diego and, I think, St. Louis picking up the tab Edmonds cannot be turned down. For the record, I bet he does just fine with the Cubs this year.

Minus a hole in the pitching line-up that needs to be filled, is this not the best Cubs team we've seen since '84? Sure, it is early and injuries can always play havoc with a season. Hands down, I think this is the most well-rounded club we've had in quite some time. Skipping past the obvious Lee, Soriano and Zambrano, guys like Mark DeRosa and Reed Johnson take up the slack quite nicely. And, it is also nice to have the 2008 rookie of the year, Geovani Soto.

I like the Cubs chances with the entire NL this year.


Mint 400: May 14, 2008

File under: Too Much Fucking Free Time

Posted by Savage Henry @ 2:59 PM

Ok, there's been a lot of COD4 played among the riders. But this is...

...well, it's actually kind of catchy.


Mint 400: May 8, 2008

Intro to Oil: Part Two

Posted by seed @ 10:58 AM

Riders are encourage to read Savage's initial Intro to Oil: Part One

Answer quickly now... Who is responsible for the record high gas prices?

(Hint: the answer is not Big Oil.)

Still no answers?

Try this: Our politicians are.

See, unlike much of Europe and Canada, America was mostly frontier fifty years ago. Sure, we had big cities and big populations. For the most part all the spaces in between the metro areas was undeveloped. Unlike other places, it was also develop-able; flat, dry, etc. So, when the automobile came online, and by that I mean everybody could afford one and the fuel to run them was readily available from a domestic source, all those empty space filled up. The result is an urban landscape that relies heavily on the ability to transfer products and people with cars and oil. Take that to the bank.

With that said, the supply of resources to support that landscape has always been available, and pretty cheap. Once our domestic supply dried up in the 70's, partly due to supply and partly due to policy, we began to rely on other sources. America was the biggest buyer on the block. Europe didn't have the need or the space for cars, Russia and China couldn't afford them. So we got to buy whatever we needed without any change in supply. [Aside: the shortages of the 70's were created by federal price fixing. Supply ran low because prices were too cheap.]

While we were able to buy what we needed abroad, our policies began to restrict what we could produce domestically. That's not a problem unless the supply available abroad begins to shrink. Enter India and China. Now there's more buyers on the block. Simple supply and demand - you got it.

At this point, our quick riders will suggest that buy reducing demand the price will go down. You're right. Except for the fact that in order to do that, you would have to tell China, India and other emerging markets that they cannot have things the way we do (because they are bad), and convince Americans to stop moving further away from employment. Why the blank stares?

Fuel prices could also be reduced by shifting demand to another resource. Let China and India buy all the oil the need while we find something smarter. Here's a clue: oil is still the best thing on the market. Run it through a hybrid and make it more efficient if you like. Ethanol is not the answer. For starters, it's not as efficient. Specifically, ethanol has a third less energy than equal parts of gas. So, you need to burn more of it to go the same distance. Producing more of it costs more gas, unless you think the tractors all run on water. Further more, the way ethanol reacts with water, specifically condensation in pipelines, the only way to transport it is with trailers. You guys see where this is going right?


Add to that line of thinking the fact that converting a food to a fuel will only increase the price of food. Taking feed grain off the market to convert to ethanol only reduces the food supply, which raises the cost of things feed grain is fed to, like milk and beef. Converting food fields to feed fields reduces the food supply further. That leads to increased food prices that effect markets abroad and, read this carefully, cause the very things that conservation policy is trying to avoid. To say that more clearly: one of global warming policy's intents is to avoid the ill-effects of climate change, ie: food shortages, starvation, etc. The cure is just as bad as the symptom. Don't believe me, here.


In wicked simple terms, that takes us up to today's situation: Rising prices due to restricted supplies and increased demand. Got it? Great.


Then we can all agree that the answer to this little mess is not: tax the oil companies and restrict domestic production further. [Aside: if Reid's thinking is correct then one would assume that eliminating farm subsidies will reduce food prices. Hilarity ensues.] Thirty years of elective restrictions are the cause. The solution is measured, controlled development of domestic supply for a short-term goal of reducing dependancy on foreign supply and reducing prices; with the long-term goal of developing a replacement technology.


Mint 400: May 1, 2008

File Under: Good Gawd

Posted by seed @ 2:57 PM

Red Wing boy takes first place in Minn. mullet contest

I am now considering the mullet as family tradition.



The Fabulous Mint 400