Physically "AFFECTED."

Man, bad grammar/spelling just pisses me off.

And there's not one of those chicks I wouldn't do repeatedly. . . and quickly.

Jeeez, between you and Johnny, I can't get a break.

As for the ad, the only chick that is questionable in the second from the left. Using the Seed Criteria for doability:
1.) Would you do her?
2.) Would do her again?
3.) Would you tell anybody?

For me, she gets bounced on the third. The other women are all 7's, 8's and 9's.

Now that I think about it, this whole campaign is BS. Dove goes out and finds Real Women that counter the status-quo-waifs of contemporary advertisingyou don't have to be under 95lbs. to be beautiful. Here's what they come up with: six women that you wouldn't kick out of bed, four of which have asses that you could wear as a hat.

For me, all of them get bounced on the third item. If I told anyone my wife might find out. None of them are good looking enough to die for. (I note in passing that I've yet to see any woman worth dying for)

However, the first one on the left has a tattoo. That's a deal breaker for me. I've never seen a tatoo on a woman that I liked. So she gets bounced for that.

Well...maybe I could just dim the lights...?

They all have asses you could wear as a hat...some are of the 10 gallon variety.

They all have asses that you could wear as a hat...just some of them are of the 10 gallon variety.